|
|
 |
BELGRADE 2008 FINAL & VOTING ORDER ANALYSIS |
As part of the annual Heads
of Delegation meeting in the host city, which this year was staged
in Belgrade on March 17th and 18th, the draw for the three
Eurovision shows (two semi-finals and final) in show broadcast on
Serbian television channel RTS and streamed live on the internet.
You can find the "All KInds Of Everything" analysis of the
two semi-finals draws, on the links above.
The second semi-final is
considered by many to be the more open and competitive of the two
semis, with few if any guaranteed finalists. Consequently the draw
may be even more key to the chances of the ninteen competing
countries on Thursday May 22nd.
The show hosted by this year's
Eurovision presenters Jovana Jankovic and Željko
Joksimovic and again it featured "wildcards" for the
first three countries drawn. These wildcards allowed those countries
to choose their positions in the running order. In the second
semi-final, the wildcards went to Macedonia (who chose #18),
Portugal (who chose #19, the final slot in the running order) and
Denmark, who broke the trend slightly by drawing #13, their Head of
Delegation, claiming that it was a lucky
number.
 |
2. UNITED
KINGDOM |
|
|
Iceland opening the 2003
Eurovision Song Contest, the last year of the old competition
format. A Top 10 result meant automatic qualification in 2004,
but for the last three years, Iceland has failed to qualify
from the semi-finals. The opening song has a 50/50
qualification record in semi-finals, so this may be the year
when Iceland is finally drawn from one of those ten golden
envelopes. |
 |
4. GERMANY |
|
|
After a series of late
slots, Sweden gets the worst possible draw in 2008. None of
the four songs which were performed second in the running
order has qualified from the semis and coming after a similar
uptempo Icelandic song makes it even harder for Charlotte
Nilsson Perrelli. However on the one time Sweden were in a
Eurovision semi, in 2006, another former contest winner
Carola, qualified with ease, albeit from a late draw. |
 |
19. FRANCE |
|
|
Turkey has competed in the
last two Eurovision semis, and has qualified on both
occasions, thanks in no small measure to immigrant votes,
which are generally not available to it this year. Had
Eurovision stuck to the same formula, Turkey would be in the
final. Considering that most of the supports are involved in
the first semi, and that no song has ever qualified from #3 in
the draw, it's a double dose for bad luck for Turkey. |
 |
22. SPAIN |
|
|
Like Turkey, Ukraine is
another recent Eurovision winner with a 100% qualification
record from the semi. Ruslana went on to win the contest in
2004 and in 2006, Tina Karol qualified. Considering its an
early draw, #4 has a good record, with qualifications for two
other ex-members of the USSR; Moldova in 2005 and Belarus in
2007. Coming so close to a similar Swedish entry will be an
interesting challenge for Ukraine. |
 |
23. SERBIA |
|
|
It took the novelty entry
"We Are The Winners" in 2006 to give Lithuania its
only qualification from the semi, and its best ever Eurovision
result. The previou year, an early draw saw Laura & The
Lovers come last in the semi. The #5 slot in the running order
has produced only qualifier, but it was a male ballad from a
Baltic country; Latvia in 2005. Perhaps this is the only good
omen for Lithuania this year. |
The second semi-final is
considered by many to be the more open and competitive of the two
semis, with few if any guaranteed finalists. Consequently the draw
may be even more key to the chances of the ninteen competing
countries on Thursday May 22nd.
While there is good news for many
countries, one competitor who might not be celebrating is 1999
Eurovision winner Charlotte Nilsson Perrelli seen on the left
celebrating her victory in the Swedish Melodifestival. Getting #2
brought an end to a run of good draws for Swededish
entries.
The rest of the draw threw up its
usual share of interest points, and below we analyse the draw and
rank the chances of each country qualifying based on their previous
semi-final record and the previous qualifiers based on running
order. For the last five entries in each semi-final, we also use their
position relative to the end of the the running order, as it's far
more significant that the 19th song in each semi this year closes the
show, rather than being 19th in a longer running order as in
previous years. We total both scores to get our "chances of
qualifying" score shown on the left hand column. As this
analysis is based on previous results only, the impact of this
year's songs cannot be factored into the equasion. Again one thing which has yet to be
confirmed is the number of advertising breaks in he semis and this
could have a serious impact on some countries chances of qualifying,
including Ireland's.
|
|
|